AI writes your code in minutes. Who reviews it?
An independent reviewer for AI-written code — every verdict traced to a file & line. Not a prompt pack.
Six error surfaces show raw English in both UI languages.
→ repair handoff, exact locations named
Same agent writes it & grades it
The problemSelf-review
“Looks good”It grades its own homework. Bad code ships with a thumbs-up.
With PIRL
FAILA different agent. Every claim points to source.
How PIRL works
4 steps · in orderstartvalidaterecordhistory
Proven on real code
Not a demoAll repairs closed — still a FAIL
Every fix verified. Then the review found a new defect the implementer missed — and sent it back.
Won't pass what it can't verify
Layout evidence was missing, so the reviewer refused to sign off. Unverified is a verdict — it stops the task.
A PASS is earned, not assumed
Same standard: gates checked, conclusions traced to file & line, review itself process-audited.
What's inside
1 zip · 34 files├─ SKILL.md · CONTEXT.md
├─ formats/ 3 · templates/ 3
├─ roles/ 9
├─ instructions/ 8
├─ procedures/ 4
└─ scripts/ 4 Python
SKILL.md + CONTEXT.md — complete skill v1.1.0start validate record historyInstall in 5 minutes
4 stepsDownload
pirl-pack-v1.1.0.zipfrom Gumroad
Unzip
pirl/
Copy in
pirl/ into your skills folder:
Claude Code.claude/skills/pirl/
Cursor.agents/skills/pirl/
Run a Plan
Start your first Plan → Implement → Review.
For you if — you ship AI-written code and want a review step that can actually say “no”, with evidence.
Early-bird pricing
One-time paymentPre-orders open Wednesday, November 11, 2026 — first 20 buyers only.
14-day money-back guarantee. Doesn't run in your setup? Full refund.
Early-bird · First 20 · 34 files + proof pack
Join the waitlistPre-orders Wed, Nov 11, 2026 · via Gumroad